A. Shandah v. Yogeswari
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition before the Madras High Court dismissed as infructuous because the underlying matter had become moot. No substantive legal propositions were laid down.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision petition dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
C.R.P.(NPD).No.1373 of 2015
A.Shandha ... Petitioner
vs.
1.Yogeswari 2.The Returning Officer cum Commissioner, Pallipalayam Panchayat Union, Pallipalayam, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal. 3.The State Election Commissioner , State of Tamil Nadu, Election Commission, Revathi Street, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Vadapalani, Chennai – 600 006. 4. The District Election Officer cum Namakkal District Collector, Tiruchengode Main Road, Siluvampatti Village and Post, Namakkal. 5.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruchengode, Namakkal. 6.Parvathy
... Respondents
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A. Shandha
- respondent
Yogeswari
- respondent
Returning Officer cum Commissioner, Pallipalayam Panchayat Union
- respondent
State Election Commissioner
- respondent
District Election Officer cum Namakkal District Collector
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court