10.From the materials on record, it is seen that the petitioner is seeking mandatory injunction and permanent injunction in respect of the suit schedule property. In the schedule to the plaint, the petitioner has mentioned survey number as 443/2 and width of the common passage as 2 feet. The petitioner in the appeal has filed present C.M.P. for correction of survey number as 446/6 and width of the common passage as 2 feet 6 inches. According to the petitioner, by inadvertence, the mistake has crept in, in the schedule of the property. On the other hand, it is the case of the respondents that by amendment, the petitioner is seeking to introduce a new case and only to drag on the proceedings, the present C.M.P. is filed, when the appeal was riped for final hearing. The relief sought for in the C.M.P. is that petitioner is seeking to correct the survey number and width of common passage. It is not the case of the respondents that common passage before the petitioner's property is only S.No.443/2 and S.No.446/6 is away from the petitioner's property. In view of the above, the petitioner is not seeking to introduce a new passage or new property by this amendment. In the property mentioned in the schedule, the
