R.Ganesh v. Kulasekaran
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed the Civil Revision Petitions as infructuous after the Subordinate Court reported that the underlying suit had been disposed of previously, leaving nothing to adjudicate.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petitions dismissed as infructuous; no costs; connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P.Nos.1028 & 1029 of 2020 and C.M.P.No.5613 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.10.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA
C.R.P.Nos.1028 & 1029 of 2020
and C.M.P.No.5613 of 2020
R.Ganesh
...Petitioner in both petitions
Vs.
Kulasekaran ... Respondent in both petitions
Prayer in C.R.P.No.1028 of 2020 : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal orders dated 22.08.2019 passed in I.A.No.68 of 2011 in I.A.No.1486 of 2002 in O.S.No.1436 of 2002 on the file of the Sub Court, Thiruchengode.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. Ganesh
- respondent
Kulasekaran
Coram
R. Hemalatha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court