9.Opposing the said submissions, Mr.L.Baskaran, learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing on behalf of the prosecution, relying upon the Judgement of the Trial Court would submit that no exception can be taken for the finding of the trial court. Firstly PW.3 and PW.5 have spoken that they have actually seen the accident, therefore the prosecution had let in clear and cogent evidence of the eyewitnesses. PW.1 and PW.2 are ocular witnesses, and coupled with the Observation Mahazar and the evidence of the Motor Vehicle Inspector, the prosecution had discharged its onus and proved its case. He would further strongly rely upon the observations of the Trial Court that the accident happened in front of the bus stand and it is common knowledge that in the vicinity, at the entrance of the bus stand, the passengers and the common public will be wandering here and there. It is required for all the drivers to take proper care and concern while driving the bus, especially, when it is being driven in a turning and while entering into the bus stand, and no fault whatsoever can be attributed in the findings of the Trial Court as well as the Lower Appellate Court. Further, in this case, the case was registered on the basis of the statement given by the deceased himself, who is the best person to narrate as to how the accident happened, therefore, in the teeth of the First Information Report being marked, which was registered based on the complaint of the deceased himself, the manner of accident is clearly and categorically proved by the prosecution. Therefore, he would pray that there is nothing
