“11. It is not the duty of the prosecution nor the Court to nominate the person to represent Gayathri Chits (A-1) and Selvam Finance (A-2). Section 305 Cr.P.C., clearly states that the accused Corporation may appoint a representative for the purpose of the inquiry or trial. Dictates of common sense demands that some human being must represent A-1 and A-2 to answer the charges, engage an advocate to defend them and answer the questions under Section 313 Cr.P.C., etc. Of course, the human agent appointed for the Corporation cannot be personally convicted and sentenced for the offence committed by the Corporation. Obviously, a sentence of imprisonment cannot be awarded to a juristic preson and only fine can be imposed. Therefore, it is open to Gayathri Chits (A-1) and Selvam Finance (A-2) to appoint anyone including one of the accused, namely A-3 to A-10 to represent them in the prosecution. If no arrangement is made by Gayathri Chits (A-1) and Selvam Finance (A-2), then they will have to suffer the consequences and cannot plead prejudice at a later point of time. Hence, liberty is given
