A.Rathinasamy, M/a 41 Years, v. S.Subramaniam
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras closed a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner, S. Ganesan, seeking a mandamus to disburse retirement and pension benefits. The court held that the benefits were already settled and the petitioner could approach authorities for monthly pension payment.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed without costs; petitioner at liberty to approach authorities for monthly pension redressal.
What the court decided
W.P.No.31828 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.09.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.31828 of 2017
S.Ganesan ... Petitioner
Vs.
- The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem), No.12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem – 636 007.
- The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem), No.12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem – 636 007. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue
a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 21.10.2017 to disburse the retirement benefits and pension benefits to the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.R.Babu
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking direction to disburse retirement and pension benefits should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Ganesan
- respondent
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem)
- respondent
The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court