This is a one-line order closing a writ petition for pension benefits. The court observed that benefits were settled and granted liberty to approach authorities for monthly pension, resulting in the petition being closed without costs. It is a thin order with no substantive legal proposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.31828 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.09.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.31828 of 2017
S.Ganesan ... Petitioner
Vs.
a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 21.10.2017 to disburse the retirement benefits and pension benefits to the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.R.Babu
1/4
W.P.No.31828 of 2017
ORDER
This petition has been filed to directing the respondents to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 21.10.2017 to disburse the retirement benefits and pension benefits to the petitioner.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents made a submission that the terminal and pensionary benefits due to the writ petitioner have already been settled. If at all, the monthly pension is yet to be paid, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the authorities for redressal of this grievance. With this liberty, this writ petition stands closed. No Costs.
22.09.2022
Index : Yes Internet : Yes Speaking order/Non-Speaking order ssr To
2/4
W.P.No.31828 of 2017
3/4
W.P.No.31828 of 2017
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
ssr
W.P.No.31828 of 2017
22.09.2022
4/4
S.Ganesan
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem)
The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem)
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
