Disposed

Salamon Mahaveerar, M/A.30 Yrs v. Esha

Madras HC26 Aug 2022CRL RC/1022/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court closed the writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking retirement and pension benefits, noting that benefits were settled regarding disparity payments, and left the petitioner to approach authorities for unresolved monthly pension issues.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner is at liberty to approach authorities for redressal of grievance regarding monthly pension; writ petition closed.

Salamon Mahaveerar, M/A.30 Yrs Vs Esha — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.No.31828 of 2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 22.09.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.31828 of 2017

¶6

S.Ganesan ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem), No.12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem – 636 007.

¶9

The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem), No.12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem – 636 007. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue

¶10

a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 21.10.2017 to disburse the retirement benefits and pension benefits to the petitioner.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.R.Babu

¶12

1/4

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

W.P.No.31828 of 2017

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This petition has been filed to directing the respondents to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 21.10.2017 to disburse the retirement benefits and pension benefits to the petitioner.

¶17

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents made a submission that the terminal and pensionary benefits due to the writ petitioner have already been settled. If at all, the monthly pension is yet to be paid, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the authorities for redressal of this grievance. With this liberty, this writ petition stands closed. No Costs.

¶18

22.09.2022

¶19

Index : Yes Internet : Yes Speaking order/Non-Speaking order ssr To

¶20

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem), No.12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem – 636 007.

¶21

2/4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P.No.31828 of 2017

¶24

The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem), No.12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem – 636 007.

¶25

3/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P.No.31828 of 2017

¶28

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

¶29

ssr

¶30

W.P.No.31828 of 2017

¶31

22.09.2022

¶32

4/4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Salamon Mahaveerar, M/A.30 Yrs v. Esha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Salamon Mahaveerar, M/A.30 Yrs v. Esha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Heerachand, Aged 55 Years, Vs State by

R.R.Muthu, AGE-48 Vs S.Sreenivasan

Rangasamy, 25 Yrs, Vs Brinthaveni

Bangaru, Prioprietor, Vs Mrs.Manju Parkavi

Veerabadran, Aged 60 Years, Vs State Rep. by

Gopalakrishnan, Aged 29 Years, Vs State Rep. by