Allowed

Anandh v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC5 May 2022CRL OP(MD)/8783/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused in a case punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of the IPC. The petitioner was directed to execute a bond and furnish two sureties, subject to strict conditions including cooperation with the trial and reporting to the court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by executing a bond for Rs. 25,000 with two sureties each for the same amount.

Anandh Vs The Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.8783 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 05/05/2022

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.S.RAMESH

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.8783 of 2022

¶8

Anandh ... Petitioner/Accused No.3

¶9

Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Avaniyapuram Police Station, Madurai (Crime No.311 of 2004) ... Respondent/Complainant

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Venkatesan, Advocate.

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶12

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

¶13

PRAYER :-For Bail in Crime No.311 of 2004 on the file of the respondent police.

¶14

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶15

The petitioner/A3, who is facing a case for the offence punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of IPC in S.C.No.9 of 2017 on the file of the learned V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madurai in crime No.311 of 2004, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶16

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

¶17

3.According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner could not attend the court, since he was down with viral fever and also since there was a lock down during the relevant point of time owing to Covid-19 pandemic. Though the case on hand pertains to 2004, it is now posted for examination of L.W.1 to L.W.15.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/3

¶20

CRL OP(MD). No.8783 of 2022

¶21

4.This Court is of the view that if the petitioner is directed to file an undertaking affidavit to co-operate with the trial, he could be granted bail.

¶22

5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madurai.

¶23

(i)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶24

(ii)the petitioner shall report before the trial Court on all working days at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

¶25

(iii)The petitioner shall also file an undertaking affidavit before the trial Court that he will co-operate during the trial;

¶26

(iii)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness;

¶27

(iv)the petitioner shall not abscond during trial;

¶28

(v)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner, in accordance with law, as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶29

sd/-

¶30

05/05/2022 / TRUE COPY /

¶31

05/05/2022

¶32

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶33

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

2/3

¶36

CRL OP(MD). No.8783 of 2022

¶37

¶38

1 THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE, MADURAI.

¶39

2 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI.

¶40

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AVANIYAPURAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI

¶41

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶42

+1 CC to Mr.R.VENKATESAN, Advocate ( SR-4323[I] dated 05/05/2022 )

¶43

ORDER

¶44

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8783 of 2022 Date :05/05/2022 SJI/LM MK/GSV/SAR.III/05.05.2022/3P/6C

¶45

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶46

3/3

Anandh v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anandh v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A. Subramani Vs The Inspector of Police

Vijayan Vs The Inspector of Police

Sakthi Sree Vs The Inspector of Police

Sahul Hameed Vs The Inspector of Police

A. Sundar @ Shanmuga Sundaram Vs The Inspector of Police

Archana Vs The Inspector of Police