Allowed

K. Sadaymmal v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC21 Apr 2022CRL OP(MD)/7405/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought modification of bail conditions imposed by the trial Court, specifically challenging the requirement to deposit Rs.50,000/- due to financial constraints resulting from her employment. The High Court refused to modify the monetary deposit condition but relaxed the daily appearance requirement.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to appear before respondent Police daily at 06.30 pm for 15 days and thereafter weekly once on every Monday at 06.30 pm; monetary deposit condition remains unaltered.

K. Sadaymmal Vs The Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.7405 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 21.04.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶6

CRL OP(MD). No.7405 of 2022

¶7

K.Sadayammal : Petitioner/Respondent Vs The Inspector of Police, Vaiyampatty Police Station, Crime No.79 of 2022. : Respondent/Respondent

¶8

Prayer : This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 439(1)(B) of Cr.P.C., to modify the onerous condition of depositing a sum of Rs.50,000/- in Cr.M.P.No.1139 of 2022, dated 30.03.2022 imposed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruchirappalli with the Crime No.79 of 2022 on the file of the respondent Police.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vikram, For Respondent : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam

¶10

Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶11

ORDER

¶12

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to modify the condition imposed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruchirappalli, in Cr.M.P.No.1139 of 2022, dated 30.03.2022, wherein the petitioner was directed to deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- in the case Crime number and also directed to appear before the respondent Police daily twice at 10.30 am and 05.30 pm until further orders.

¶13

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is working in Anganvadi Centre and she is not in a position to deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- as directed by the trial Court. Hence, he seeks modification.

¶14

3.Considering the quantum of amount involved, this Court is not inclined to modify the condition regarding the deposit of Rs.50,000/-. But, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the nature of the charges levelled against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to modify the condition to the effect that the petitioner is directed to appear before respondent Police daily at 06.30. pm for a period 15 days and thereafter, shall appear before the respondent Police weekly once

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

1/2

¶17

CRL OP(MD). No.7405 of 2022

¶18

i.e., on every Monday at 06.30 pm, until further orders and the other conditions imposed by the trial Court shall remain unaltered. The petitioner is at liberty to approach the concerned Court for further relaxation or modification, if any required.

¶19

4.In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar (CS-II)

¶21

// True Copy //

¶22

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶23

das

¶24

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶25

¶26

The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruchirappalli.

¶27

2.The Inspector of Police, Vaiyampatty Police Station,

¶28

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶29

+1CC to Mr.S.Vikram, Advocate, SR.No. 20615

¶30

CRL OP(MD) No.7405 of 2022 21.04.2022

¶31

CK(CO) KB(29.04.2022) 2P 5C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

2/2

K. Sadaymmal v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K. Sadaymmal v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhivan Vs The Inspector of Police

Ilavarasan Vs The Inspector of Police

Arunkumar Vs The inspector of Police

Inbaraj Vs The Inspector of Police

Viswanadhan Vs the Inspector of Police

Velusamy Vs The Inspector of Police