Dismissed

R. Remigius Jude v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC12 Jul 2022CRL OP(MD)/7357/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court disposed of a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. by observing that no FIR or complaint was registered against the petitioner, rendering the petition unconnected to an active proceeding.

What did the court decide?

None. The petition was disposed of with the observation that it is incompetent as no FIR or complaint was pending against the petitioner.

R. Remigius Jude Vs The Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 12/07/2022

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.7357 of 2022

¶8

R.Remigius Jude

¶9

... Petitioner/Accused

¶10

Rank Not Known

¶11

¶12

State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Samayanallur Police Station,

¶13

Madurai District.

¶14

(Crime.No.Not Known of 2022). ... Respondent/Complainant

¶15

(*)2. Anusthika ... 2^nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant

¶16

(*) (R2-Suo Motu impleaded as per Order of this hon`ble Court

¶17

dated 21.04.2022 in Crl.OP.(MD) No.7357 and 7360/2022 by KMSJ)

¶18

For Petitioner : M/s.Anto Prince.G., Advocate.

¶19

For Respondents: Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi, for R1 Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶20

No Appearance for R2

¶21

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶22

PRAYER :-

¶23

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.Not known of 2022 on the file of the Respondent police.

¶24

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶25

The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 406, 420 and 498 (A) of I.P.C. and Section 4 and 6 of Dowry Prohibition

¶26

¶27

Act, in Crime No. not known of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶28

2.The learned Government Advocate(Crl. side) submits that till now no complaint has been received and no FIR has been pending against the petitioner.

¶29

3.Since no complaint has been registered against this petitioner, this criminal original petition is disposed of.

¶30

Sd/12/07/2022 / TRUE COPY /

¶31

/07/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.II) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶32

¶33

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶34

¶35

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SAMAYANALLUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶36

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶37

+1. CC to M/S. ANTO PRINCE.G. Advocate SR.No.6956

¶38

ORDER

¶39

IN CRL OP(MD) No.7357 of 2022 Date :12/07/2022

¶40

SP/SVR/SAR II/18/07/2022/2P/4C

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R. Remigius Jude v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R. Remigius Jude v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Vs The Inspector of Police

A.Natrayan Vs The Inspector of Police

Vasanthi Vs The Inspector of Police

Murugesan Vs The Inspector of Police

Malaikannan Vs The Inspector of Police

G.Parthiban Vs The Inspector of Police