Allowed

Baskar @ Baskaran v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC6 Apr 2022CRL OP(MD)/6383/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who faced arrest for public nuisance, assault, and criminal intimidation. The court considered the nature of the offence, the discharge of the injured person, and the release of co-accused.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; petitioner ordered to appear before Judicial Magistrate within 15 days and report to police daily.

Baskar @ Baskaran Vs The Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.6383 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 06/04/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN CRL OP(MD). No.6383 of 2022

¶3

Baskar @ Baskaran ... Petitioner/1^st Accused Vs The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Navalpattu Police Station, Trichy District. Crime.No. 54 of 2022. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s. Lenin Kumar.T., Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.R.Sivakumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶4

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶5

PRAYER :-

¶6

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.54 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent police.

¶7

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶8

The petitioner/Accused No.1, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506 (ii) I.P.C, in Crime No.54 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶9

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to pathway dispute between the petitioners's wife and the de-facto complainant, forbearing which, the petitioner and other accused abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and the petitioner's wife attacked the de-facto complainant with broomstick, thereby, she suffered injuries. Hence, the complaint.

¶10

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. The co-accused were already been granted anticipatory bail by the Sessions Court.

¶11

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent police submitted that the injured person has been https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ discharged from the hospital.

¶12

1/2

¶13

CRL OP(MD). No.6383 of 2022

¶14

5.Considering the nature of offence, the overt act attributed against the petitioner, the injured person has been discharged from the hospital and the co-accused have been released on bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶15

6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Trichy, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶16

7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

¶17

sd/-

¶18

06/04/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶19

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶20

¶21

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III, TRICHY. 2. DO-THROUGH : THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT.

¶22

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NAVALPATTU POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶23

+1 CC to M/s.T.LENINKUMAR, Advocate ( SR-3063[I] dated 07/04/2022 )

¶24

sji

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ USK/VR/SAR-IV/12.04.2022/2P/6C

¶26

2/2

Baskar @ Baskaran v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baskar @ Baskaran v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Manoharan, Vs the Chief Electoral Officer

C.Rajagopal, Vs the Principal Accountant

The General Manager, Vs Special Deputy Commissioner of

Thiru.C.Prabakara Rao Vs The Commissioner

The Management Vs The Special Deputy

Iffco Kisan Sanchar Ltd, Iffco Vs Union of India