Disposed

Sankaranarayanan v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC3 Feb 2022CRL OP(MD)/6270/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court, Madurai Bench, quashed a quashing petition under Section 482 CrPC. Since the investigating officer filed a final report finding insufficient material against one accused but sufficient against others, the petition was disposed of with a direction to the trial court to accept the final report for further legal remedies.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed; Trial Court directed to accept final report; Petitioners to pursue remedies later.

Sankaranarayanan Vs the Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

Crl.O.P(MD)No.6270 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 03.02.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

Crl.O.P(MD)No.6270 of 2019 and Crl.M.P(MD)No.4136 of 2019

1.Sankaranarayanan

2.Sadaiappan

3.Chandrasekaran

... Petitioners/Accused Nos.2 to 4

¶11

-vs-

¶12

1.The State of Tamil nadu, rep. by the Inspector of Police, Dhadikombu Police Station,

¶13

Dindigul District. (In Crime No.101 of 2019).

¶14

2.Kirubadevi ... Respondents/Defacto complainant

¶15

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records relating to the FIR in Crime No.101 of 2019, on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same as illegal.

¶16

For R2 : Mr.S.Titus

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Cr.No.101 of 2019.

¶19

Now, it is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that pending disposal of this petition, the Investigating Officer has completed the investigation and filed final report, wherein, it is found that there is no material to prosecute the third petitioner herein, who is shown as 4^th accused in the complaint, whereas, being satisfied with the prima https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

1/2

¶21

Crl.O.P(MD)No.6270 of 2019

¶22

facie material available in the course of investigation, final report has been filed against the petitioners 1 & 2, who are accused Nos. 2 & 3 and yet another accused, who is not before this Court.

¶23

Taking note of the subsequent development after filing this criminal original petition, it is suffice to direct the trial Court to take the final report on file and serve copy to the accused persons. If the petitioners are aggrieved, they can work out their remedy in accordance with law before framing of charge or at subsequent stage.

¶24

With this observation, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/-

¶25

Assistant Registrar (CS-I)

¶26

// True Copy //

¶27

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶28

¶29

Note :

¶30

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

¶31

¶32

1.The Inspector of Police, Dhadikombu Police Station, Dindigul District.

¶33

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶34

Crl.O.P(MD)No.6270 of 2019 03.02.2022

¶35

RK(10/02/2022) 2P 3C

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶37

2/2

Sankaranarayanan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sankaranarayanan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arulpreethi Vs M.Palkamu

Surulisamy, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Chellammal, W/O.Ashok Kumar Vs the Inspector of Police

Mrs. Muthulakshmi, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Arputhanantham Vs the Superintendent of Police

C.Subbaiah Vs the Superintendent of Police