Allowed

Mohamed Fakrudeen @ Munir v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC1 Apr 2022CRL OP(MD)/5559/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed petitions to modify anticipatory bail conditions. The mandatory stay at Usilampatti and twice-daily reporting were deleted, while appearing daily at Thideer Nagar Police Station was retained.

What did the court decide?

Mandatory stay at Usilampatti and twice-daily reporting requirement were removed; direction to appear daily at Thideer Nagar Police Station was retained.

Mohamed Fakrudeen @ Munir Vs The Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). Nos.5559 and 5562 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 01/04/2022

¶5

CORAM

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶7

CRL OP(MD). Nos.5559 and 5562 of 2022

¶8

1.Mohamed Fakrudeen @ Munir 2.Mohamed Shazuli @ Aswak 3.Mohamed Ajam 4.Askanther Sheriff @ Irfan 5.Shahul Hameed : Petitioners (in Crl.OP(MD)No.5559/2022)

¶9

1.Musthafa ali 2.Ayaz 3.Ussain ali 4.Basith Ibrahim 5.Ilkhan 6.Sasuli Ameen 7.Sikkender Ali 8.Athavullah 9.Mahaboobatcha 10.Thubail : Petitioners (in Crl.OP(MD)No.5562/2022) Vs

¶10

State represented by The Inspector of Police, Thideer Nagar Police Station, Madurai. (Crime No.82 of 2022) : Respondent (in both petitions)

¶11

COMMON PRAYER: Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 482 r/w. Section 439(1)(b) of Cr.P.C., to modify the condition imposed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai, dated 08.03.2022 in Crl.M.P.Nos.1012 and 1098 of 2022, directing the petitioners shall stay at Usilampatti and sign before the Inspector of Police, Usilampatti Town Police Station daily twice at 10.00 am and 05.00 pm for 30 days, thereafter, they shall appear and sign before the Inspector of Police, Thideer Nagar Police Station, daily at 10.00 am until further orders.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

1/3

¶14

CRL OP(MD). Nos.5559 and 5562 of 2022

¶15

(in both petitions) For Petitioners : Mr.R.Venkatesan

¶16

For Respondent : Mr.M.Muthu Manikkam,

¶17

Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

¶18

COMMON ORDER

¶19

These Criminal Original Petitions are filed to modify the condition imposed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai, in Crl.M.P.Nos.1012 and 1098 of 2022, dated 08.03.2022, directing the petitioners to stay at Usilampatti and sign before the Inspector of Police, Usilampatti Town Police Station daily twice at 10.00 am and 05.00 pm for 30 days, thereafter, they shall appear and sign before the Inspector of Police, Thideer Nagar Police Station, daily at 10.00 am until further orders.

¶20

It is evident from the records that the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai, in Crl.M.P.Nos.1012 and 1098 of 2022, dated 08.03.2022 has granted anticipatory bail with the above conditions. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioners have filed the present petitions, seeking modification of the conditions.

¶21

3.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the offence alleged, this Court is inclined to modify the condition imposed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai, and the petitioners are directed to appear before the Inspector of Police, Thideer Nagar Police Station, daily at 10.00 am until further orders and the other conditions imposed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai, shall remain unaltered.

¶22

4.In view of the above, the Criminal Original Petitions are allowed.

¶23

// True Copy //

¶24

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶25

Das

¶26

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

2/3

¶29

CRL OP(MD). Nos.5559 and 5562 of 2022

¶30

¶31

1.The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai.

¶32

2.The Inspector of Police, Thideer Nagar Police Station, Madurai. 3.The Inspector of Police, Usilampatti Police Station, Madurai. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶33

CRL OP(MD). Nos.5559 and 5562 of 2022 Date : 01/04/2022

¶34

TR(21.04.2022) 3P 5C

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

3/3

Mohamed Fakrudeen @ Munir v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohamed Fakrudeen @ Munir v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohankumar Vs The Inspector of Police

C.Kamatagi, Vs the Union of India

Pawan Kumar Vs the Union of India

Mohamed Fakrudeen @ Munir Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

M.Kaleelullah Sheriff Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

Athavullah Vs The Inspector of Police