Disposed

Chandrakala v. The Superintendent of Police

Madras HC18 Mar 2022CRL OP(MD)/5112/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 CrPC, the petitioner sought police protection. The court directed the second respondent to complete the investigation and take action if further subsequent illegalities occur, disposing of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to complete investigation and take appropriate action if further subsequent illegalities arise.

Chandrakala Vs The Superintendent of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

CRL.O.P (MD) No.5112 of 2022

¶2

Chandrakala

¶3

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.03.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL.O.P (MD) No.5112 of 2022

¶4

... Petitioner

¶5

¶6

The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

¶7

The Inspector of Police, Sivagangai Taluk Police Station, Sivagangai District.

¶8

Kanagavalli 4. Muniyandi 5. Alagumalai ... Respondents

¶9

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying to direct the 2^nd Respondent to give Police Protection for the Petitioner's life and limb based on the Petitioner's Representation dated 08.03.2022 .

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sathish Kumar For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 & R2

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to provide police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner, on the basis of his representation dated 08.03.2022.

¶13

2 .The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, Crime No.61 of 2022 was registered. All the accused were arrested and remanded to judicial custody. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the accused indulged in the same illegality as against the petitioner even now.

¶14

3.Considering the above, the second respondent is directed to complete the investigation and take appropriate action as against the accused, if any further subsequent illegalities arise.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

1/2

¶17

CRL.O.P (MD) No.5112 of 2022

¶18

4.This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶19

Sd/Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy //

¶20

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ias To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2. The Inspector of Police, Sivagangai Taluk Police Station, Sivagangai District.

¶21

The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 CC to M/s.K.SATHISH KUMAR, Advocate ( SR-13267[F] dated 21/03/2022 )

¶22

Order made in CRL.O.P (MD) No.5112 of 2022 18.03.2022

¶23

SR(CO) GC(04.04.2022) 2P 5C

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

2/2

Chandrakala v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrakala v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Marimuthu Mani Vs The Sub-Inspector of Police

A.Periyya Vs The Inspector of Police

Shanawaz Vs The Inspector of Police

K. Sasiraman Vs The Inspector of Police

I.Kader Batcha Vs The Inspector of Police

R.Muthuselvam Vs The Inspector of Police