The Court dismissed a petition for anticipatory bail filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. as infructuous because a separate petition for quashing filed by a co-accused on the basis of a compromise was previously allowed by this Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL OP(MD). No.3099 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Date : 19/07/2022
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN
CRL OP(MD). No.3099 of 2022
For Petitioners : M/s.Prabhu K., Advocate. For Respondent-1 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Additional Public Prosecutor For Respondent-2 : M.J.Meyakumaran, Advocate
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C
PRAYER :-
For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.29 of 2022 on the file of the respondent Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :-
The learned counsel on either side would submit that on the basis of the compromise reached between the parties, quash petition was filed by the co-accused before this Court, in Crl.OP(MD)No.8504 of 2022 and that was allowed on 17.06.2022. Hence, the matter become infructuous.
1/2
CRL OP(MD). No.3099 of 2022
2.Recording the above submission, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
/ TRUE COPY /
/07/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
TO
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.3099 of 2022 Date :19/07/2022 DSS
USK/SVR/SAR-I/28.07.2022/2P/3C
2/2
J.Mary Grace
R.S.Kannan
The State Rep.
Latha
G.ILANGOVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
