Alagesan v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court accepted the respondent's submission that the petitioner had complied with summons under Section 160 and 91 Cr.P.C. Consequently, the criminal original petition to quash the summons was closed.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P(MD)No.2240 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.04.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P(MD)No.2240 of 2022 in Crl.M.P(MD)No.1643 of 2022
Dr.Alagesan
... Petitioner
Vs.
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manapparai Sub Division, Manapparai,
Trichy District.
...Respondent
Prayer : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to the impugned summons by the respondent dated 02.01.2022 and quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioners : Mr.P.Gunasekaran For Respondent : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate (Crl.side)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dr. Alagesan
- respondent
Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manapparai Sub Division, Manapparai, Trichy District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court