Petitioner filed a Criminal Original Petition seeking police protection for agriculture works. The court recorded that the respondent police had closed an enquiry. The petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 25.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.(MD).No.14392 of 2021
S.Ettamma Naicker ...Petitioner
Vs.
2.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.
4.The Inspector of Police, Eriyodu Police Station, Dindigul District.
5.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Gujiyamparai Police Station, Dindigul District.
6.Kuppa Naicker
7.K.Palanisamy
8.K.Mari Naicker
9.K.Perumal
10.K.Muthayee
11.R.Thoppa Naicker
12.Vellathayee ...Respondents
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to direct the respondents 1 to 5 to provide adequate police protection for life and limb of the petitioner and his family members consequently provide police protection to the petitioner for doing agriculture works in lands comprised in S.F.Nos.40/10, 41/17A, 41/17B, 41/18, 41/19, 35/1A, 37/1, 38 and 39, situated at https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Chinnaluppai Village, Gujiliyamparai Taluk, Dindigul District based upon the representations, dated 04.02.2021 and 15.02.2021.
2
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Gokulraj For R1 to R5 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor
For R6, R9, R10 and R12 : No appearance For R7 and R11 : Mr.S.Saravagan Prabhu
ORDER
The criminal original petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 5 to provide adequate police protection for life and limb of the petitioner and his family members consequently provide police protection to the petitioner for doing agriculture works in lands comprised in S.F.Nos.40/10, 41/17A, 41/17B, 41/18, 41/19, 35/1A, 37/1, 38 and 39, situated at Chinnaluppai Village, Gujiliyamparai Taluk, Dindigul District, based upon the representations, dated 04.02.2021 and 15.02.2021.
2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police stated that based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, the respondent police had conducted enquiry and closed the same on 28.08.2021.
3.Recording the said submission, the criminal original petition stands dismissed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS II)
// True Copy //
/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
lr
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
1.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Madurai Zone, Madurai.
3 2.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District. 3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vedasanthur, Dindigul District. 4.The Inspector of Police, Eriyodu Police Station, Dindigul District. 5.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Gujiyamparai Police Station, Dindigul District. 6.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 CC to M/s.S.SARVAGAN PRABHU, Advocate ( SR-20983[F] dated 25/04/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.S. GOKULRAJ, Advocate ( SR-21112[F] dated 26/04/2022 ) Crl.O.P.(MD).No.14392 of 2021 25.04.2022 MGJ(25.05.2022) 3P 9C
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction for police protection under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.
S.Ettamma Naicker
The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Madurai Zone
Kuppa Naicker
K.Palanisamy
K.Mari Naicker
K.Perumal
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
