Dismissed

V.S.Pandi v. P.Chellapandian

Madras HC22 Apr 2022CRL OP(MD)/12425/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Crl.O.P. filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash Section 138 NI Act proceedings was dismissed. The court dispensed with the petitioner's personal appearance at the trial court, allowing it for specific stages, while directing expedited trial.

What did the court decide?

Personal appearance of petitioner before trial court dispensed with subject to specific charges and Section 313 CrPC; trial court to expedite trial.

V.S.Pandi Vs P.Chellapandian — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12425 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.04.2022

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR CRL.O.P.[MD].No.12425 of 2020 and CRL.M.P.[MD]Nos.5607 and 5610 of 2020

¶5

V.S.Pandi ... Petitioner / Sole Accused Vs. P.Chellapandian ... Respondent / Complainant

¶6

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, pursuant to the complaint in C.C.No.22 of 2020 and to quash the same.

¶7

For Petitioner : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh For Respondent : Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan

¶8

ORDER

¶9

Though this petition has been filed to quash the proceedings initiated under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, now, confined his submission only with regard to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court.

¶10

2.Considering the submissions and taking note of the fact that the loan transaction led to filing of the complaint, the personal appearance of the petitioner is dispensed with before the trial Court, except for answering the charges, receiving copies, questioning under Section 313 of Cr.P.C., or any other date to be fixed by the trial Court. The trial Court shall also expedite the trial and dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible.

¶11

3.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶12

Sd/-

¶13

Assistant Registrar (T&P)

¶14

// True Copy //

¶15

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶16

Myr

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

1/2

¶19

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12425 of 2020

¶20

¶21

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai.

¶22

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶23

+1 CC to M/s.S.C. HEROLD SINGH, Advocate ( SR-20764[F] dated 25/04/2022 )

¶24

CRL.O.P.[MD]No.12425 of 2020

¶25

22.04.2022

¶26

SS(CO) KB(04.05.2022) 2P 4C

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

2/2

V.S.Pandi v. P.Chellapandian

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.S.Pandi v. P.Chellapandian

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Saravanan Vs The Public Prosecutor

Arunchenthil Vs The Inspector of Police

ArunKumar, Vs The Inspector of Police

Bharath Rohini Vs R.Shyamala

Duraivel Rajan Vs R. Shyamala

M.Tharaniganth Vs S.P.Rajeswari