In a criminal original petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court quashed a sexual assault case due to a compromise agreement between the parties, as noted by the learned public prosecutor.
Allowed Crl.O.P. No.12178 of 2019; Quashed STC No.436 of 2013; Closed connected MPs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.12178 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 02.11.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.12178 of 2019 Crl.M.P.(MD) Nos.7650 and 7651 of 2019
A.Gilbert Josline Rose ... Petitioner
-vs-
K.G.Udhayakumar ... Respondent
Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in connection with STC No. 436 of 2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, I, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District, and quash the same same against the petitioner as accused.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Ragatheeshkumar for M/s.Isaac Chambers
For Respondents : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the defacto complainant submitted that the matter has been compromised between the parties.
1/3
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.12178 of 2019
agreement that was entered into between the parties before the mediation centre has also been produced before this Court.
02.11.2022
Internet : Yes RR To 1.The Judicial Magistrate NO.I Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District
2/3
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.12178 of 2019
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.
RR
Crl.O.P. (MD)No.12178 of 2019
02.11.2022
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to quash criminal complaint STC No.436 of 2013 in view of compromise between parties.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Gilbert Josline Rose
K.G.Udhayakumar
N.Anand Venkatesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
