Disposed

R.Varadarajan v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC10 Jun 2022CRL OP/8534/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. sought execution of a non-bailable warrant. As the accused had surrendered and the trial was pending for five years, this court dismissed the prayer for warrant execution but directed the trial court to complete the trial within three months.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for execution of warrant dismissed; direction to trial court to complete trial within three months.

R.Varadarajan Vs the Superintendent of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 10.06.2022

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶5

CRL.O.P.NO.8534 OF 2022

R.Varadarajan,

S/o.B.Rengaraj Naidu

...Petitioner

Versus

1.The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvarur,

¶11

Collector Office Master Plan Complex, Tamil Nadu – 610 004.

¶12

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruthuraipoondi, Tamil Nadu – 614 713.

¶13

3.The Inspector of Police, Thiruthuraipoondi Police Station, Thiruthuraipoondi, Tamil Nadu – 614 713.

¶14

4.V.Dhasaratharaman ...Respondents

¶15

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent police 1 to 3 to forthwith execute the non-bailable warrant issued by the learned Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court, Thiruthuraipoondi in S.T.C.No.151 of 2017 against the 4^th respondent.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Prithvi Chopda For Respondents : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan, Addl. Public Prosecutor for R1 to R3

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction directing the respondents 1 to 3 to execute the nonbailable warrant issued by the learned Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court, Thiruthuraipoondi in S.T.C.No.151 of 2017 against the 4^th respondent.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

Though this petition has been filed seeking a direction

¶21

to execute non-bailable warrant, the accused already surrendered before the trial court. In such view of the matter, no further order is required in this petition. Considering the fact that the trial is pending for more than five years, the trial court shall complete the trial and dispose the proceedings within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order without any further delay. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar(CS-VII)

¶24

// True Copy //

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶26

rpp

¶27

¶28

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Tract Court, Thiruthuraipoondi.

¶29

2.The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvarur, Collector Office Master Plan Complex, Tamil Nadu – 610 004.

¶30

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruthuraipoondi, Tamil Nadu – 614 713.

¶31

4.The Inspector of Police, Thiruthuraipoondi Police Station, Thiruthuraipoondi, Tamil Nadu – 614 713.

¶32

5.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶33

CRL.O.P.No.8534 of 2022

¶34

AJS(CO) RVM(23/06/2022)

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Varadarajan v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Varadarajan v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Vimaleswaran Vs the State Rep by

C.Vimaleswaran Vs the State Rep by

S.Suresh Kanna Vs the Commissioner of Police

G.Peter Ronald @ Ronald Vs State Rep by

Mansoor Ali Vs the Superintedent of

M.Govindarasu Vs the Superintendent of Police