Petitioner State filed a Criminal Original Petition under Section 378(3) Cr.P.C. to quash acquittal of accused in murder/murder-by-beating case, alleging trial Court failed to appreciate prosecution evidence. Bench granted leave.法院 dismissed
Leave for special leave appeal granted; Registry directed to number appeal and post for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.7848 of 2022 in Crl.A.No.SR9387 of 2022
Crl.O.P.No.7848 of 2022 in Crl.A.No.SR9387 of 2022
P.N.PRAKASH, J. AND A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
(Made by P.N.PRAKASH,J. )
Challenging the judgment and order of acquittal of the respondent/accused
dated 16.12.2020 passed in S.C.No.352 of 2017 on the file of the I Additional District and Sessions Court, Tindivanam, the petitioner/State has filed the present appeal along with this criminal original petition seeking special leave under Section 378(3) Cr.P.C.
1/2
Crl.O.P.No.7848 of 2022 in Crl.A.No.SR9387 of 2022
P.N.PRAKASH, J. AND A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
nsd
the trial Court has not appreciated the evidences of the prosecution witnesses 1 to 4 in the appropriate perspective and therefore, this is a fit case to grant leave.
Accordingly, this criminal original petition is allowed by granting leave. The Registry is directed to number the appeal, if the same is otherwise in order and post the appeal for admission.
(P.N.P.,J.) (A.A.N.,J.)
05.04.2022
nsd
Crl.O.P.No.7848 of 2022 in Crl.A.No.SR9387 of 2022
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial Court's view of the prosecution evidence regarding assault and death was appropriate to warrant granting special leave to appeal.
Whether the evidence of prosecution witnesses PW1 to PW4 was appreciated in the appropriate perspective by the trial Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State
Kalidass's son (Respondent/Accused)
P.N.PRAKASH
A.A.NAKKIRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
