Kamsala v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court directed the respondent police to issue proper summons to the petitioners, who were omitted in a related charge sheet filed against other accused based on a similar complaint, and to file a supplementary final report within two months.
What did the court decide?
Directed the respondent police to issue proper summons to the petitioners and file a supplementary final report within two months.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P.No.749 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.07.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
Crl.O.P.No.749 of 2022
1.Kamsala 2.R.Ponniammal 3.V.Velu 4.Munusamy .. Petitioners
Versus
1.State Rep by Superintendent of Police Chengalpet District
2.The Sub-Inspector of Police DCB, Chengalpet District .. Respondents
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the first respondent to transfer the entire files relating to the complaints of the petitioners dated 13.10.2014 on the file of the second respondent herein, to any other investigation agency more preferably to the CBCID, Chengalpet District, or any other competent Investigation Agency with a direction to register the complaints of the petitioners, dated 13.10.2014 and to complete the investigation.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent police are directed to issue summons to the petitioners who were not summoned in a related charge sheet filed against other accused.
Whether the respondent police should file a supplementary final report before the Trial Court within two months.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
1.Kamsala, 2.R.Ponniammal, 3.V.Velu, 4.Munusamy
- respondent
State Rep by Superintendent of Police Chengalpet District
- respondent
The Sub-Inspector of Police DCB, Chengalpet District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court