Dismissed

M/S. Dhanalakshmi Srnivasan v. M/S. Housing and Urban

Madras HC18 Apr 2022CRL OP/7462/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted permission to withdraw multiple Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash Section 138 NI Act proceedings. The petitions were dismissed as withdrawn by mutual agreement of parties, who stated that 90% of the amounts had been paid.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw all CR. O.Ps and CR. M.Ps; cases dismissed as withdrawn.

M/S. Dhanalakshmi Srnivasan Vs M/S. Housing and Urban — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 18.04.2022

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.Nos.7462 to 7464 & 7472 to 7479 of 2016

¶6

and

¶7

Crl.M.P.Nos.3950, 3952, 3954, 3956, 3940, 3942, 3944, 3948, 3960 & 3962, 3958 of 2016

¶8

1. M/s. Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Charitable and Educational Trust, Represented by his Managing Trustte, Mr.A. Srinivasan, No.274-C, Thuraiyur Road, Perambalur-621 212.

¶9

2. A. Srinivasan, Managing Trustee,

¶10

M/s. Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Charitable and Educational Trust, No.274-C, Thuraiyur Road, Perambalur-621 212.

¶11

3. P. Neelraj, Trustee,

¶12

M/s. Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Charitable and Educational Trust, No.274-C, Thuraiyur Road, Perambalur-621 212.

¶13

4. S. Kathiraven, Trustee,

¶14

M/s. Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Charitable and Educational Trust, No.274-C, Thuraiyur Road,

¶15

Perambalur-621 212.

¶16

... Petitioners / Accused 1 to 4 in all the Crl.O.Ps

¶17

Vs.

¶18

M/s. Housing and Urban Development Corporation Ltd., (M/s.HUDCO)(A Government of India Enterprises) Rep., by its Authorised person and Deputy Manager (Finance), Mr.A.Paramanathan, 5th Floor, CMDA Tower I, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road,Egmore, Chennai-600 008.

¶19

... Respondent / Complainant in all the Crl.O.Ps

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

Common Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in STC Nos.272/2015, 716/2015, 718/2015, 1947/2014, 3543/2014, 3544/2014, 719/2015, 720/2015, 270/2015, 1973/2014, 715/2015 on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Perambalur and quash the same.

¶22

For Petitioner : Mr. G. Maniprabhu in all Crl.OPs for Mr. S. Ramachandran A.Jeenasenan

¶23

For Respondent : Mr.D.R.S. Kesavan

¶24

in Crl.OP.No.7472/16 Mr.G.Mani Prabhu in Crl.OP.Nos.7479,7478,7477,7476, 7475,7474,7473,7463,7464 & 7462/16

¶25

C O M M O N O R D E R

¶26

Mr. G. Maniprabhu, learned counsel representing for counsel on record Mr.A.Jeenasenan and Mr.S.Ramchandran, submitted that all the cases arose out of dishonour of cheques and criminal cases had been filed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that 90% of the amount involved in all the cases had been paid. That was also accepted by the learned counsel for the respondent. The parties are in the process of settling all the dispute and therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner may be permitted to withdraw all the petitions.

¶27

2. Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, permission is granted to withdraw all the petitions. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

Assistant Registrar(CS III)

¶30

/True Copy//

¶31

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶32

¶33

¶34

The Judicial Magistrate,

¶35

Perambalur.

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶37

+3ccs to M/s.R.Priyakumar, Advocate, S.R.No.26111,26110,26109

¶38

Crl.O.P.Nos.7462 to 7464 & 7472 to 7479 of 2016 and Crl.M.P.Nos.3950, 3952, 3954, 3956, 3940, 3942, 3944, 3948, 3960 & 3962 of 2016

¶39

NMI[co] NSK/19/05/2022

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S. Dhanalakshmi Srnivasan v. M/S. Housing and Urban

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Dhanalakshmi Srnivasan v. M/S. Housing and Urban

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Rajasekaran Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Savithri Vs Lisa

Savani Transports Pvt. Ltd., Vs State Rep. by

Pappa Subramanian, Vs Santhi Gunamani

Maria Francis Borgians, Vs the State Rep. by Inspector of

Chandrasekar Vs Uma Sankari