Disposed

E.P.Raj v. State Rep by

Madras HC28 Jan 2022CRL OP/670/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 CrPC, the petitioner sought a direction to register an FIR regarding a grievance lodged earlier. The court directed the petitioner to appear before the police with his complaint copy and noted that the matter is currently undergoing enquiry via a Current Paper number.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to appear before respondent police on 08.02.2022 with complaint copy for enquiry with counter complainant.

E.P.Raj Vs State Rep by — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 28.01.2022

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

¶5

CRL.O.P.NO.670 OF 2022

¶6

E.P.Raj ... Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State By:

¶9

The Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai – 600007.

¶10

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Triplicane District, Chennai.

¶11

The Inspector of Police, Chintadripet Police Station, Chennai. ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER:

¶13

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to direct the respondent to register a F.I.R. based on the petitioner's complaint dated 23.11.2021.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Sathish For Respondents: Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

This petition has been filed to direct the respondent to register a F.I.R. based on the petitioner's complaint dated 23.11.2021.

¶17

The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner had lodged a complaint on 23.11.2021 and no First Information Report has been registered.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted

¶20

that earlier the petitioner had lodged a complaint and CSR No.187 of 2021 assigned, on 03.05.2021, they had enquired the petitioner and the counter complainant. The CSR had been closed on 24.05.2021. Now the petitioner again sent a fresh complaint for the same facts which is in the stage of Current Paper number enquiry and the same would be conducted and appropriate steps would be taken. He further submitted that the petitioner can appear before the respondent Police on 08.02.2022 along with the copy of the complaint and the thereafter, the counter complainant would be called for enquiry and the petitioner's complaint would be disposed of.

¶21

4. In view of the same, the petitioner shall appear before he respondent Police on 08.02.2022 along with the copy of the complaint.

¶22

5. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶25

//True Copy//

¶26

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶27

dna/mpl

¶28

¶29

The Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai – 600007.

¶30

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Triplicane District, Chennai.

¶31

The Inspector of Police, Chintadripet Police Station, Chennai.

¶32

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶33

+1cc to Mr.M.Rajkumaran, Advocate, S.R.No.5384

¶34

CRL.O.P.No.670 of 2022

¶35

PCH(CO)

¶36

PM/08/02/2022

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

E.P.Raj v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

E.P.Raj v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anbalagan Vs the Superintendent of Police

Jayachandran Vs State Rep by

K.Sakkarapani Vs the District Superintendent of Police

A.Senthilkumar Vs Kumar

K.Muthulakshmi Vs State Rep by

Rajarajan Vs the Superintendent of Police