Dismissed

Mohammed Sadiq Basha@Sadiq Basha v. Intelligence Officer

Madras HC28 Jun 2022CRL OP/6307/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Madras dismissed a bail petition filed by Mohammed Sadiq Basha accused of illegal possession of 14.650 Kg. of Ketamine. The Court rejected the plea due to the large quantity of contraband and cited no change in circumstances from a prior dismissed petition.

What did the court decide?

Bail application dismissed. Petitioner remains in custody pending trial.

Mohammed Sadiq Basha@Sadiq Basha Vs Intelligence Officer — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Twenty Eighth day of June Two Thousand Twenty Two

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.6307 of 2022

¶7

AGAINST

¶8

C.C.NO.88 OF 2018

¶9

(ON THE FILE OF THE 1ST ADDITIONAL SPECIAL JUDGE, SPECIAL COURT UNDER

¶10

EC AND NDPS ACT, CHENNAI)

¶11

MOHAMMED SADIQ BASHA @ SADIQ BASHA [PETITIONER/ACCUSED]

¶12

¶13

INTELLIGENCE OFFICER [ RESPONDENT ] NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU, CHENNAI ZONAL UNIT, CHENNAI- 600 077.

¶14

For Petitioner : M/S. G.MURUGENDRAN Advocate

¶15

For Respondent : MR.N.P.KUMAR, SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶16

FOR NCB CASES

¶17

PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.

¶18

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶19

The petitioner who was arrested on 27.04.2018 for the offence under Section 8C r/w 22, 28 and 29 of the NDPS Act in C.C.No.88 of 2018 on the file of the learned 1st Additional Special Judge, Special Court under EC and NDPS Act, Chennai, seeks bail.

¶20

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with the other accused is alleged to have been found in illegal possession of 14.650 Kg. of Ketamine, a Psychotropic Substance covered under the NDPS Act.

¶21

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that earlier, the petitioner approached this Court by filing Crl.O.P.No.17878 of 2018 and this Court has dismissed the said petition.

¶24

5.Considering the quantity of the contraband seized from the accused and since there is no change in circumstances subsequent to the order passed in Crl.O.P.No.17878 of 2018, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶25

6.Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed.

¶26

-sd/-

¶27

28/06/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶28

TRUE COPY

¶29

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶30

¶31

1 IST ADDITIONAL SPECIAL JUDGE, SPECIAL COURT UNDER EC AND NDPS ACT, CHENNAI

¶32

2 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PUZHAL, CHENNAI

¶33

3 INTELLIGENCE OFFICER INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU, CHENNAI ZONAL UNIT, CHENNAI- 600 077. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶34

CC to M/S. G.MURUGENDRAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶35

RVR 04/07/2022

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mohammed Sadiq Basha@Sadiq Basha v. Intelligence Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Sadiq Basha@Sadiq Basha v. Intelligence Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gem Granites Affirm Registered Vs C.Rathinam(died)

C. Rathinam(Deceased), Vs the State of Tamilnadu

A.R. Munuswamy Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

R.L.Geetha Vs State of Tamil Nadu

D.Selvakumar, Vs District Revenue Officer

R.Radhakrishnan, Vs The Executive Officer