Thennarasu v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
A bail petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was dismissed. The court noted that the petitioner had 21 prior cases of a similar nature, despite having complied with previous interim bail conditions.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner's bail petition was dismissed; interim bail for marriage was previously granted but deemed insufficient given 21 prior cases.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Thirtieth day of March Two Thousand Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.6039 of 2022
THENNARASU [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
STATE BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUKANNAPURAM POLICE STATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT. CRIME NO.66 OF 2022
For Petitioner : M/S.J.ASOKAN Advocate
For Respondent : M/S.G.V.KASTHURI, Additional public Prosecutor
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail shall be granted to a petitioner having 21 previous cases of similar nature who had previously obtained interim bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
THENNARASU
- respondent
STATE
Coram
G. JAYACHANDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court