Disposed

R.Vignesh v. the State Rep by

Madras HC27 Jun 2022CRL OP/4110/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought direction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for police protection against alleged threats arising from an encroachment Writ Petition. Court refused blanket protection but directed police to act if violence is likely.

What did the court decide?

Court refused blanket direction but directed police to take necessary action against the third respondent if violence is likely to be unleashed.

R.Vignesh Vs the State Rep by — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 27.06.2022

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶5

CRL.O.P.NO.4110 OF 2022

R.Vignesh

... Petitioner

The State rep by The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

¶10

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bargur, Krishnagiri District.

¶11

The Inspector of Police, Nagarasampatti Police Station, Krishnagiri District.

¶12

Chinnasamy 5. Ponnan 6. Nagaraj

¶13

Madan

¶14

Kumar

¶15

Muthu 10.Vel

¶16

11.Govindhasamy

¶17

... Respondents

¶18

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the third respondent to provide police protection to the petitioner's and his family member's life by considering the petitioner's complaint dated 22.01.2022.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Ilayaperumal For Respondents : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan for R1 to R3, Additional Public Prosecutor Mr.M.Loganathan for R4, No appearance for R5 to R11.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking direction to the third respondent to provide police protection to the petitioner's and his family member's life by considering the petitioner's complaint dated 22.01.2022.

¶23

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner had filed the Writ Petition before this Court to remove the encroachments in S.No.335, 366, 368/16 and 369/2 of Balekuli Village, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Based on the above said Petition, the petitioner apprehends that there is threat to his life. Hence, he seeks police protection.

¶24

Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents police would submit that the Writ Petition filed by this petitioner is already ordered. Based on the order passed by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice in WP.No.399 of 2022 dated 09.02.2022, enquiry has been conducted and the same has been closed.

¶25

Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents police.

¶26

Such view of the matter, this Court cannot issue any blanket direction. However, if any violence is likely to be unleashed against the petitioner, the third respondent police is directed to take necessary action as per law.

¶27

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

Assistant Registrar(CCC)

¶30

//True Copy//

¶31

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶32

shk/ham

¶33

¶34

The Superintendent of Police,

¶35

Krishnagiri District,

¶36

Krishnagiri.

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶38

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bargur, Krishnagiri District.

¶39

The Inspector of Police, Nagarasampatti Police Station, Krishnagiri District.

¶40

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. +1cc to M/s.A.Ilayaperumal, Advocate, S.R.No.39721 SR(CO) RLP(07/07/2022)

¶41

Crl.O.P.No.4110 of 2022

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Vignesh v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Vignesh v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dayalan Vs State Rep by

Rajkumar @ Bommi Vs the Inspector of Police

D.K.v.Gangatharan Vs Inspector of Police

G.Kannan Vs the Superintendent of Police

Kesavan Vs State Rep by

Muhammad Mujeebur Rahman Vs the State Rep by