S.Pushparaja v. the State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Order dismissed anticipatory bail petition by directing the respondent to complete police enquiry within two weeks. No substantive legal proposition established.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Seventh day of January Two Thousand Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.39 of 2022
S.PUSHPARAJA [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, S-10, PALLIKKARANAI POLICE STATION, CHENNAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2021
[ RESPONDENT ]
For Petitioner : M/S. M.RAVIKUMAR Advocate
For Respondent : MR.A.GOKULAKRISHNAN, Additional public Prosecutor
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL 438 Cr.P.C.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.PUSHPARAJA
- respondent
THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Coram
T.V. THAMILSELVI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court