Dismissed

Jeyandran v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC28 Mar 2022CRL OP/31817/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal quashing petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court of Madras held that since the criminal trial had proceeded logically with witness examinations and the recording of the accused's statement, the proceedings could not be quashed at this stage. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition dismissed and connected Miscellaneous Petitions closed.

Jeyandran Vs the Inspector of Police — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 28.03.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.31817 of 2019

¶6

and Crl.M.P.Nos.17015, 17423 & 17425 of 2019 and 2975 of 2022

¶7

Jeyandran S/o. Palanisamy

¶8

Ramkumar

¶9

S/o. Muthusamy

¶10

Parthiban S/o. Kanakasababathy ... Petitioners/Accused 1 to 3

¶11

Vs.

¶12

The Inspector of Police, Dharapuram Police Station, Tiruppur District. (Crime No.207 of 2019) ... Respondent /Complainant

¶13

PRAYER: Criminal Original petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, prayed to call for the records in S.C.No.56 of 2019 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District and quash the proceedings therein as against the petitioners herein.

¶14

For Petitioners : Mr.B.R.Prabhu

¶15

For Respondents : Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶16

ORDER

¶17

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the case in S.C.No.56 of 2019 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

The learned Government Advocate (crl. Side) submits that the case is of the year 2019 and all the witnesses had been examined.

¶20

The Sub Inspector of Police, who is present before this Court, submitted that even the Investigation Officer also had been examined and the proceedings under Section 313 Cr.P.C., was also initiated.

¶21

In view of the above, this Court is of the view that at this stage, quash proceedings cannot at all be taken since the trial had proceeded. It is to be taken to its logical conclusion. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶22

SD/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶23

// TRUE COPY //

¶24

SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶25

¶26

To.

¶27

The Subordinate Judge, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District.

¶28

The Inspector of Police, Dharapuram Police Station, Tiruppur District.

¶29

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai.

¶30

+1cc to M/s.Rajendra Prasad K., Advocate Sr.21227

¶31

Crl.O.P.No.31817 of 2019

¶32

skm[co] srg 11/04/2022

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Jeyandran v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jeyandran v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.N. Ramalingam Vs Latha Rani

M.N. Ramalingam Vs Dr. Sanjay Vijayaraj

Ganesh @ Purushothaman Vs State Rep.by

M.Ilangovan Vs the State Rep by

P.Asirvatham Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

G.Velugonda Reddy Vs State Rep.by