Cricket Original Petition filed to quash proceedings under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioners were unwilling to appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.04.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
Crl.O.P.No.25746 of 2016
1.Sundari 2.Vijayaraman 3.Vijaya 4.Madasamy 5.Parameshwari ...Petitioners
Vs.
1.Kairunnisa Begam
2.The Protection Officer Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram. ...Respondents
Prayer :- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to call of the records pertaining to the proceedings in D.V.C.No.4 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Kanchipuram and quash the same.
For Petitioners : M/s.G.M.Sankar (No appearance)
For Respondents : Mr.R.Murthi (For R2) Government Advocate (Crl. Side) High Court of Madras.
ORDER
This petition is filed to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings in D.V.C.No.4 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Kanchipuram and quash the same.
2.There was no representation for the petitioners on 28.03.2022. Therefore, this matter was ordered to be posted under the caption for dismissal. Today also there is no
representation for the petitioners. Therefore, Criminal Original Petition in Crl.O.P.No.25746 of 2016, is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ep
To
1.The Judicial Magistrate No.1, Kanchipuram. 2.The Protection officer, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram.
Crl.O.P.No.25746 of 2016
PL(CO) SB(21/04/2022)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sundari
Vijayaraman
Vijaya
Madasamy
Parameshwari
Kairunnisa Begam
G. Chadraskheharan
Mr. Justice G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
