Allowed

G.Karthik v. State Rep by

Madras HC5 Jan 2022CRL OP/25476/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Madras granted bail to the petitioner arrested for offences under IPC sections 341, 147, 148, 294(b), 392, 397, and 506(ii). Considering the completion of investigation and period of incarceration, the court ordered release on own bond and two sureties, subject to strict daily reporting and other conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on own bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties for Rs.10,000 each, subject to conditions including daily police appearance.

G.Karthik Vs State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 05.01.2022

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.25476 of 2021

G.Karthik

...Petitioner

Vs.

The State rep. by Inspector of Police, Vellore North Crime Police Station, Vellore District. (Crime No.329 of 2021)

¶10

...Respondent

¶11

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending investigation in Crime No.329 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sathish Kumar

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.N.S.Suganthan Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶14

ORDER

¶15

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶16

The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.12.2021 for the offences under Sections 341, 147, 148, 294(b), 392, 397, 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.329 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶17

The case of the prosecution is that the de facto complaint is an auto driver. On 08.12.2021 at about 04.00 a.m. he was proceeding towards green circle and while nearing GRT Pandiyan Hotel, the petitioners waylaid him and at knife point, robbed a sum of Rs.2,500/- and a MI-cell phone from him. Hence, the complaint.

¶18

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he is no way connected with the alleged offence and he has been falsely implicated in this case and He would

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

further submit that the petitioner has been suffering incarceration for more than 25 days from 08.12.2021 and hence, he would pray for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶21

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would raise

¶22

objection stating that there are totally 6 accused in this case out of which, A3 to A6 have been arrested and the petitioner is arrayed as A5 and that the other accused / A1 and A2 are still absconding. He would further submit that the stolen mobile phone has been recovered and out of the robbed amount of Rs.2,500/- a sum of Rs.1,600/- has been recovered but admits that the investigation is almost completed and there is no previous case against the petitioner.

¶23

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no previous case against the petitioner and the investigation is almost completed and also considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶24

(a) Accordingly, the Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing his own bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only), before the Superintendent of the concerned prison, in which the Petitioner has been confined and thereafter on his release;

¶25

(b) the petitioner shall execute two sureties for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, before the learned Judicial MagistrateNo-IV, Vellore, Vellore District, within 15 days from the date of commencement of the Court’s normal functioning, failing which the bail granted by this Court shall stand dismissed automatically;

¶26

(c) the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the learned Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar Card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶27

(d) the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 05.30 p.m. until further orders.

¶28

(e) the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature;

¶29

(f) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

(g) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶32

(h) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the Petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the Petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

¶33

(i) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶34

-sd/-

¶35

05/01/2022

¶36

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶37

TRUE COPY

¶38

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO

¶39

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.IV, VELLORE.

¶40

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VELLORE. [FOR INFORMATION]

¶41

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶42

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLORE NORTH CRIME POLICE STATION, VELLORE DISTRICT.

¶43

5 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, VELLORE.

¶44

+1 CC to M/S. M.SATHISH KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.164

¶45

CRL OP.25476/2021

¶46

Date :05/01/2022 TA-05/01/2022

¶47

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.Karthik v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Karthik v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Sasikala Vs S.Alexander

R.Dhanalakshmi Vs State Rep by

Alaguraja Vs State by

Ramesh Vs the State Rep by

V.Maranmathy Vendarasi Vs State Rep by

Vikramsingh Vs the State Rep by