3.The contention of the petitioner is that the complaint is highly artificial and a false case was registered. It is further stated that the petitioner was not present in the place of occurrence and there are number of CCTV cameras in the place of occurrence and if it is verified, it would unequivocally tacit that the petitioner was not present in the place of occurrence during the relevant point of time. It is further submitted that after the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Washermenpet took charge, more than 30 drug cases were foisted against the family members and friends of the accused who were involved in murder and other cases even though they were not connected with the cases. Further, in order to arrest A2/Guruprasath, who is involved in various cases, the petitioner's name was intentionally wielded in this case. The second respondent by using his incumbent power had illegally arrested the petitioner and kept in the Police Station, wherein the petitioner was attacked and fractured his left leg. Thereafter, before the petitioner before the concerned Magistrate, the Inspector of Police, H5 New Washermenpet Police Station overawe the petitioner by placing gun towards his head and threatened him to state before the Doctor and the learned Magistrate that his leg got fractured by falling from the bridge. The petitioner had stated the same before the Doctor and the same was recorded in the Accident Register. When the petitioner was produced before the learned Magistrate, the petitioner informed the Remanding Magistrate about the Inspector of Police, H5 New Washermenpet Police Station attacking him and
