Maheswari v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition was filed seeking a mandamus directing government officials to take action on a representation alleging misappropriation of Panchayat funds by local office bearers.
What did the court decide?
Directed the District Collector to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 26.7.2022 within four weeks after hearing all concerned.
What the court decided
W.P.No.26297 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.09.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.T.RAJA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
W.P.No.26297 of 2022
R.Rajendiran
.. Petitioner
Vs
- 1.The Director, Vigilance Anti-Corruption, No.283, M.K.N.Road, Alandur, Chennai.
- 2.The District Collector, Mayiladuthurai District, Mayiladuthurai.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the District Collector should be directed to pass orders on the petitioner's representation regarding alleged misappropriation of Panchayat funds.
What timeline was set for the officials to consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Rajendiran
- respondent
The Director, Vigilance Anti-Corruption
- respondent
The District Collector, Mayiladuthurai District
- respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Mayiladuthurai District
- respondent
M.Chozharajan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court