Court disposed of an anticipatory bail petition by directing police to complete the pending enquiry within two weeks, register FIR or close the petition without taking coercive steps against the petitioner.
Direction to complete inquiry within two weeks, register FIR or close petition, and no coercive steps during inquiry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.20460 of 2022
Crl.O.P.No.20460 of 2022
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No. Not known of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petition enquiry is pending against the petitioner.
3.The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent police is harassing the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.
Page 1 of 2
Crl.O.P.No.20460 of 2022
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
mn
of.
29.08.2022
mn
Crl.O.P.No.20460 of 2022
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether police shall be directed to conduct enquiry and refrain from coercive steps during the said period
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
POLICE
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
