The Madras High Court dismissed a Criminal Original Petition seeking quashing of an FIR. The court held that since the investigation was completed and the petitioners' names were dropped in the final report, nothing survived for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.01.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
CRL.O.P.NO.1827 OF 2018 AND CRL.M.P.NO.708 OF 2018
PRAYER:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime No.47 of 2015 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same in respect of the petitioners herein.
For Petitioners : Mr.K.Balasubramaniam
For Respondents : R1 - Mr.R.Kishore Kumar Government Advocate (Criminal Side) R2 – Left
O R D E R
This petition has been filed to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No.47 of 2015 on the file of the first respondent against the petitioners for the offences punishable under Sections 120(b), 419, 465, 468, 471, 420 & 506(i) of I.P.C.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vrc/kbs
To
CRL.O.P.NO.1827 OF 2018 AND CRL.M.P.NO.708 OF 2018
SMI(CO) PBS/21/01/2022
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a quashing petition persists for adjudication where investigation is completed and the accused has been dropped from the final report.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shivgan K Patel
Ramila G Patel
Nathu K Patel
Gopal K Patel
Hirbai S Patel
Pushpa N Patel
N.Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
