The court dismissed the Criminal Original Petition seeking to quash a complaint as infructuous because the Respondent later filed a petition to compound the offence.
The Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous; the connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.04.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
Crl.O.P.No.1689 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.No.1066 of 2019
Boopathy Chitra ... Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Non Corporate Ward 7(1), New Block, Aayakar Bhawan, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. ... Respondent
Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records in E.O.C.C.No.617 of 2017 on the file of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Economic Offences–II, Egmore, Chennai and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Jayaprakash
For Respondent : Mr.N.Baskaran Special Public Prosecutor (Income Tax)
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash E.O.C.C.No.617 of 2017 on the file of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Economic Offences – II, Egmore, Chennai.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sp
To
Crl.O.P.No.1689 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.No.1066 of 2019
SKM (CO) PR (28/04/2022
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Boopathy Chitra
Income Tax Officer, Non Corporate Ward 7(1), Chennai
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
