Dismissed

Jaisingh @ John Jaisingh v. the State Rep by

Madras HC1 Jul 2022CRL OP/13304/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court dismissed a bail petition as it had already been dismissed earlier for the petitioner's absconding and delay. Despite the trial nearing completion as directed, the Court held the petition need not be entertained since judgment would be delivered soon after the final witness examination.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner's bail petition is dismissed. Order to be observed by all concerned.

Jaisingh @ John Jaisingh Vs the State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the First day of July Two Thousand Twenty Two

¶4

The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN

¶5

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.13304 of 2022

¶6

JAISINGH @ JOHN JAISINGH [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]

¶7

¶8

THE STATE REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, H-8, THIRUVOTTIYUR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI. (CRIME NO.787/2016)

¶9

For Petitioner : M/S. B.SHANKAR Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : MR. S.UDAYAKUMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶11

PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

This Court, on 01.03.2022 while considering the bail petition had dismissed the petition, considering the conduct of the petitioner who was absconding for a along time and delayed the trial. However, while dismissing the bail petition, Court has also directed the trial Court to complete the trial preferably within a period of four months. The four months period expires today.

¶14

Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) states that out of 35 witnesses 34 witnesses already been examined and the matter is posted for examination of Investigation Officer on 06.07.2022.

¶15

In the light of the above fact, this Court is not inclined to entertain this bail petition, since substantially the direction of this Court has already been complied with. Except I.O., all other witnesses have already been examined and hopefully, the judgment in

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

this matter will be delivered soon after the examination of I.O., who is asked to appear before the trial Court for examination on 06.07.2022.

¶18

Hence, the bail petition is dismissed.

¶19

-sd/-

¶20

01/07/2022

¶21

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶22

TRUE COPY

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO

¶24

1 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PUZHAL, CHENNAI.

¶25

2 INSPECTOR OF POLICE, H-8, THIRUVOTTIYUR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

¶26

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶27

CC to M/S. B.SHANKAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶28

CRL OP.13304/2022

¶29

Date :01/07/2022 RW-04/07/2022

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Jaisingh @ John Jaisingh v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jaisingh @ John Jaisingh v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State Rep by Vs M/S.Subiksha Trading Services

Anand, M/a 29 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its

Jaiganesh @ Jayaganesh Vs State Rep by

Suresh Kumar Vs State Rep. by

Ganesan Vs the State Rep by Its

P.Krishnamoorthy Vs v.C.Ravichandran