Dismissed

Vasantha Kumar v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Madras HC3 Feb 2022CRL MP(MD)/869/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the petitioner's plead to modify appearance conditions. Directed the petitioner to appear daily at the Special Court because he failed to sign the electronic record during the lockdown and had been prevented by the Special Judge.

What did the court decide?

Directs petitioner to sign before Special Court daily at 10:30 a.m. until further orders.

Vasantha Kumar Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police — Madras HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CRL MP(MD) No.869 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Third day of February Two Thousand and Twenty Two PRESENT

¶3

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI

¶4

CRL MP(MD) No.869 of 2022 and CRL A(MD) No.489 of 2021

¶5

VASANTHA KUMAR ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER/ APPELLANT/ACCUSED

¶6

¶7

THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EMANESWARAM POLICE STATION, PARAMAKUDI TALUK, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

¶8

CR.NO. 127 OF 2018. ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/

¶9

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶10

Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to modify the condition that the Petitioner/Appellant shall appear before the said court daily at 10.30 a.m. pending appeal in the order passed in Crl.MP.No.10073 of 2021 in C.A.No.489 of 2021 dated 24.11.2021.

¶11

PRAYER IN CRL A(MD) No.489 of 2021:

¶12

To call for the records and set aside the order of conviction and sentence passed in SSC.No.5/2019 dated 18-03-2021 on the file fo the Hon'ble Session Court, Special Court for trial of cases registered under SC/ST(POA)Act 1989, Ramanathapuram and allow this appeal and acquit the appellant/accused from the charges against him.

¶13

Order : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.SHYLLAPPA KALYAN.N, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.R.M.ANBUNITHI, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent, the Court made the following order:-

¶14

This petition has been filed to modify the condition that the petitioner / appellant shall appear before the said Court daily at 10.30 am., pending the appeal in the order passed in Crl.M.P.(MD) No.10073 of 2021 in Crl.A.(MD)No.489 of 2021, dated 24.11.2021.

¶15

2.On the side of the petitioner, it is stated that the petitioner was not allowed to enter the collector office premises on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

1/2

¶17

CRL MP(MD) No.869 of 2022

¶18

14.01.2022. Subsequently, when the petitioner tried to sign before the Court, the Special Judge prevented the petitioner from appearing.

¶19

A report from the Special Judge also reveals that the petitioner has not signed before the Court from 14.01.2022 onwards. In view of the same, this Court directs the petitioner to sign before the Special Court, daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

¶20

With the above condition, this petition is dismissed.

¶21

sd/-

¶22

03/02/2022

¶23

/ TRUE COPY /

¶24

/ /2022

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶26

NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶27

¶28

1 THE SESSIONS JUDGE SPECIAL COURT FOR TRIAL OF CASES REGISTRED UNDER SC/ST (POA) ACT 1989, RAMANATHAPURAM

¶29

2 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

¶30

EMANESWARAM POLICE STATION, PARAMAKUDI TALUK, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

¶31

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶32

+1. C.C. to M/S.SHYLLAPPA KALYAN N Advocate SR.No.807

¶33

SS/JM/SAR-III/15.02.2022 : 2P/5C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

2/2

Vasantha Kumar v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vasantha Kumar v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baskaran Vs The Inspector of Police

Wahith @ Abdul Wahith Vs The Second Class Taluk Executive Magistrate cum Revenue Tahsildar

Sahabdeen Vs Mohamed Meeran

Muruganantham Vs The Inspector of Police

M.Anandaraj Vs The Sub Divisional Magistrate cum Revenue Divisional Officer

Ganesan @ Padaikambu Ganesan Vs The Administrative Executive Magistrate cum Deputy Commissioner of Police (North)