Disposed

M/s.Burmeister and Wein Energy Project Office v. M/s.Geeco Enercon Private Limited

Madras HC28 Apr 2022CRL MP(MD)/5420/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court disposed of a Criminal Original Petition filed to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioners in pending criminal proceedings and opposed a connected petition to quash the same. The court admitted the petition and ordered that the personal appearance of the accused petitioners be dispensed with.

What did the court decide?

Personal appearance of the petitioners in C.C.No.467 of 2018 before the Judicial Magistrate II, Tiruchirappalli is dispensed with.

M/s.Burmeister and Wein Energy Project Office Vs… — Company and Corporate | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

CRL MP(MD) No.5420 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Eighth day of April Two Thousand and Twenty Two PRESENT

¶3

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶4

CRL MP(MD) No.5420 of 2022 IN CRL OP(MD) No.7995 of 2022

¶5

1 BURMEISTER AND WEIN ENERGY PROJECT OFFICE, REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY ALBERTO MISTRANGELO.

¶6

2 ALBERTO MISTRANGELO ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 & 2

¶7

¶8

M/S.GEECO ENERCON PRIVATE LIMITED, REP.BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER,

¶9

C.JAISHANKAR ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶10

Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the 2^nd Petitioner/2^nd Petitioner/Accused-2 in C.C.No.467 of 2018 pending on the file of Hon'ble Magistrate II, Tiruchirappalli pending disposal of this Criminal Original Petition.

¶11

Prayer in CRL OP(MD). 7995/ 2022 :

¶12

To call for the records of CC No.467/2018 pending on the file of Honble Judicial Magistrate II, Tiruchirappalli and to quash the same as against the petitioners.

¶13

Order : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.SURANA AND SURANA, Advocate for the petitioner, while admitting the Criminal Original Petition, it is ordered that the personal appearance of the petitioners in CC.No.467 of 2018 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate II, Tiruchirappalli be and hereby are dispensed with.

¶14

/ /2022

¶15

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

1/2

¶18

CRL MP(MD) No.5420 of 2022

¶19

¶20

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, TRICHY.

¶21

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT.

¶22

ORDER

¶23

¶24

CRL MP(MD) No.5420 of 2022 IN CRL OP(MD) No.7995 of 2022

¶25

Date :28/04/2022

¶26

RS/VR/SAR.1 (29.04.2022) 2P-3C

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

2/2

M/s.Burmeister and Wein Energy Project Office v. M/s.Geeco Enercon Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Burmeister and Wein Energy Project Office v. M/s.Geeco Enercon Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sridharan Vs The Superintendent of Police

Sathiya Vs THe Deputy Superintendent of Police

P.Oliver Robersan Vs The Inspector of Police

Velmurugan Vs Ranjitha

Karuppasamy a Vs The Superintendent of Police

S. Richard Singh Vs The Inspector of Police