Partly allowed

Ganesan v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC28 Jan 2022CRL MP/770/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought relaxation of daily reporting conditions in an anticipatory bail order. The court modified the condition to require the petitioner to appear before the police on the first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m., keeping other conditions unchanged.

What did the court decide?

Reporting condition relaxed to appear before police on first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m.; other conditions remain unaltered.

Ganesan Vs the Inspector of Police — Madras HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Twenty Eighth day of January Two Thousand Twenty Two

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.770 of 2022

¶6

CRL OP.20271/2021

¶7

GANESAN [ PETITIONER ]

¶8

¶9

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE [ RESPONDENT ] VENNANDUR POLICE STATION, NAMAKKAL DISTRICT (CRIME NO.700/2021)

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders imposed in Crl.O.P.No.20271/2021 dated 29.10.2021 on the file of this Honble High Court and pass such and other orders which may deem fit and proper and thus render justice

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S M.SUBASH, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.A.GOKULAKRISHNAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶12

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.20271 of 2021 dated 29.10.2021.

¶13

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly imposed by this Court.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

Considering the said submission, the condition imposed on the petitioner is modified to that effect that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police on first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. All other conditions remain unaltered.

¶16

-sd/-

¶17

28/01/2022

¶18

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY

¶19

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶20

¶21

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RASIPURAM

¶22

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NAMAKKAL(FOR INFORMATION)

¶23

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VENNANDUR POLICE STATION, NAMAKKAL DISTRICT

¶24

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶25

5 THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER NAMAKKAL

¶26

C.C. To M/S M.SUBASH Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶27

Order in CRL MP.770/2022 in CRL OP.20271/2021 Date :28/01/2022

¶28

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶29

RVR 04/02/2022

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ganesan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganesan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sukundhan Vs State Rep by

Sathish@Kulla@Sathish Kumar Vs State Rep by

K.Muruganandham Vs State Rep by

Prakash Vs the State Rep.by

Ramesh Kumar Vs State Rep.by

A.Muthukumar Vs the State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by