Dismissed

Olai Saravanan @Saravanan v. State Rep by

Madras HC22 Apr 2022CRL MP/5275/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras dismissed a bail petition seeking suspension of sentence pending disposal of a criminal appeal. The court refused to entertain the petition in view of the petitioner's antecedents, including seven previous cases and one registered under Section 302 IPC.

What did the court decide?

Suspend sentence and enlarge petitioner on bail pending disposal of CRL.A.434 of 2022.

Olai Saravanan @Saravanan Vs State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Twenty Second day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice R. PONGIAPPAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.5275 of 2022

¶7

IN CRL.A.434 of 2022

¶8

OLAI SARAVANAN @ SARAVANAN [ PETITIONER/APPELLANT ]

¶9

¶10

STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, J2, ADYAR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI. (CR.NO. 97 OF 2013)

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the Memorandum of Grounds in CRL.A.434 of 2022 on the file of the High Court, the High Court will be pleased to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner in S.C.No. 309 of 2014 on the file of the Learned XVIII Additional Sessions Judge , Chennai dated 07.09.2021 enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the CRL.A.434 of 2022. (CRL.MP.NO.5275/2022)

¶12

This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the Memorandum of Grounds in CRL.A.434 of 2022 on the file of the High Court and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. M.VIJAYA KUMAR Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.LEONARD ARUL JOSEPH SELVAM,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶13

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(crl.side) appearing for the respondent police.

¶14

It is the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (crl.side) that during the time of trial before the trial court, the petitioner is in the custody. Further, the petitioner is having seven previous cases, in which one case is registered for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

Therefore, considering the previous antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition seeking suspension of sentence. Accordingly, this petition in Crl.MP.No.5275 of 2022 is dismissed.

¶17

-sd/-

¶18

22/04/2022

¶19

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶20

TRUE COPY

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶22

¶23

1 THE XVIII ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, CHENNAI.

¶24

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, J2, ADYAR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

¶25

3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON,PUZHAL.

¶26

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶27

C.C. to M/S. M.VIJAYA KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges

Order

CRL MP.5275/2022

CRL.A.434/2022

Date :22/04/2022

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶35

CSK 31/05/2022

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Olai Saravanan @Saravanan v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Olai Saravanan @Saravanan v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Senthilkumar Vs K.Ganeshbabu

R.Natarajan Vs Udayam Egg Center

Hariharan Vs Easwaramurthy

Pushpa Vs State Rep by

R.Kumar Vs State Rep by

Jayakumar Vs State Rep by