Dismissed

Thiruvenkatapathy @ Venkatapathy v. State Rep by

Madras HC18 Apr 2022CRL MP/5050/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras dismissed a petition seeking to relax bail conditions regarding daily police appearance. The court rejected the petition because the accused had failed to comply with bail terms since March 26, 2022, directing the respondent to initiate cancellation of bail.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; respondent directed to take action for cancellation of bail.

Thiruvenkatapathy @ Venkatapathy Vs State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Eighteenth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.5050 of 2022

¶7

IN CRL OP.882/2022

¶8

THIRUVENKATAPATHY @ VENKATAPATHY [ PETITIONER/ACCUSED ]

¶9

¶10

STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVALLUR TOWN POLICE STATION, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.1092/2021)

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the Bail condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30am until further orders imposed on the petitioner in Crl.OP.882/2022 dated 12.01.2022

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S R.SASIKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶13

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P. No.882 of 2022 dated 12.01.2022.

¶14

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶15

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) states that the petitioner has not complied the conditions since 26.03.2022.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Recording the same, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed and it is upon the respondent to take appropriate action for cancellation of bail.

¶18

-sd/-

¶19

18/04/2022

¶20

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶21

TRUE COPY

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶23

¶24

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, THIRUVALLUR.

¶25

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVALLUR [FOR INFORMATION]

¶26

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVALLUR TOWN POLICE STATION, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT.

¶27

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶28

C.C. to M/S R.SASIKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶29

Order in CRL MP.5050/2022 in CRL OP.882/2022 Date :18/04/2022

¶30

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶31

CSK 22/04/2022

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Thiruvenkatapathy @ Venkatapathy v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thiruvenkatapathy @ Venkatapathy v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Palanivel Vs the Inspector of Police

Venkatachalam Vs State Rep by

Krishnan Vs State Rep by

Tamizharasan Vs State Rep by

M.Karthi Vs the Inspector of Police

Ram Kumar Vs State Rep.by Its