Allowed

Duraisamy v. the State Rep by Its

Madras HC21 Apr 2022CRL MP/4190/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a petition under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C. to suspend the petitioner's sentence and grant bail. The court held that the substantial grounds raised in the pending appeal requiring detailed appraisal entitled the already incarcerated petitioner to bail pending disposal.

What did the court decide?

The sentence of imprisonment is suspended and bail is granted executed on a bond for Rs.25,000/- with two sureties, including a blood relative, subject to appearance conditions.

Duraisamy Vs the State Rep by Its — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 21.04.2022

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN

¶7

Crl.M.P.No.4190 of 2022

¶8

in Crl.A.No.358 of 2022

¶9

Duraisamy

¶10

.. Petitioner/Accused

¶11

Vs.

¶12

State represented by The Inspector of Police, Rasipuram Police Station, Namakkal District. (Crime No.591 of 2012) .. Respondent/Complainant

¶13

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C., to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner by judgment and order dated 23.02.2022 passed in S.C.No.40 of 2013 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Namakkal and to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the appeal.

¶14

For petitioner : Mr.C.Prabakaran

¶15

For Respondent : Mr.M.Babu Muthumeeran Additional Public Prosecutor

¶16

ORDER

¶17

(Made by P.N.PRAKASH , J. )

¶18

This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner by judgment and order dated 23.02.2022 passed in S.C.No.40 of 2013 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Namakkal and to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the appeal.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

The petitioner was tried along with four other accused in S.C.No.40 of 2013 before the Additional District and Sessions Court, Namakkal, in the which, the learned trial Judge, has, by judgment and order dated 23.02.2022 , convicted the petitioner of the offence under Section 307 IPC and sentenced him to undergo seven years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-, in default to undergo three months simple imprisonment. However, some of the co-accused have been convicted of the offence under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life.

¶21

Challenging the above conviction and sentence, the petitioner has filed Crl.A.No.358 of 2022 along with the instant criminal miscellaneous petition seeking suspension of sentence and bail.

¶22

Heard Mr.C.Prabakaran, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Babu Muthumeern, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent/State.

¶23

It appears that there was a quarrel between two groups, in which, the petitioner himself had suffered serious injuries and was admitted in the hospital.

¶24

The petitioner has raised substantial grounds in the appeal, which require detailed appraisal. Moreover, the petitioner has been in incarceration since 23.02.2022. In such view of the matter, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is entitled to the relief of suspension of sentence and bail.

¶25

Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition stands allowed and the sentence of imprisonment is suspended and bail is granted to the petitioner on the following conditions:

¶26

(i) The petitioner shall be released on bail on he executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-, with two sureties, of whom, one should be a blood relative, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Namakkal;

¶27

(ii) The sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the trial Court may obtain a copy of their mobile number, Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; and

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶29

(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on the first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m. until the disposal of the appeal and if he is not able to appear before the trial Court on any day, he shall make arrangements to file an application under Section 317 Cr.P.C. and shall appear before the trial Court on any other day in lieu of the date of his absence, as directed by the trial Court.

¶30

-sd/-

¶31

21/04/2022

¶32

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶33

TRUE COPY

¶34

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶35

(*)Amended as per order of this Court dated 27.04.2022 made in CRL.MP.NO.5762/2022 in CRL.A.NO.358/2022.

¶36

¶37

1 THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, NAMAKKAL.

¶38

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RASIPURAM POLICE STATION, NAMAKKAL DISTRICT.

¶39

(*)3 THE SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL PRISON, COIMBATORE.

¶40

4 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, SALEM.

¶41

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶42

5 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶43

+1C.C. to M/S C.PRABAKARAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.6355

¶44

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶45

CSK 22/04/2022

¶46

CSK 28/04/2022

¶47

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Duraisamy v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Duraisamy v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chitra Vs The State rep by its

The Director General of Police Vs S. Vasanthi

Rasu@Raji Vs the Superintendent of Police

V.Amuthavalli Vs The Secretary to Government

Kumaresan Vs the State Rep by

Kalyanasundara Vs the Commissioner of Police