Allowed

Kanniyappan v. the State Rep.by

Madras HC25 Mar 2022CRL MP/3899/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras, in a criminal miscellaneous petition, allowed the petitioner's application to relax bail conditions. The court directed the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required, despite the investigation being incomplete.

What did the court decide?

Petition for relaxation of bail conditions allowed; petitioner directed to appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required for interrogation.

Kanniyappan Vs the State Rep.by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Twenty Fifth day of March Two Thousand Twenty Two

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.3899 of 2022

¶7

KANNIYAPPAN [ PETITIONER ]

¶8

¶9

THE STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NAGARASAMPATTY POLICE STATION, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT.

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition which was imposed on the petitioner in Crl.OP.No.22679 of 2021 order dated 29.11.2021 shall report before the Nagarasampatty police station, Krishnagiri District daily at 10.30a.m until further orders.

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. D.ARUN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR. S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶12

This petition has been filed to relax the conditions imposed in Crl.OP.No.22679 of 2021 dated 29.11.2021.

¶13

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶14

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police has submitted that the petitioner is scrupulously complying with the condition without any deviation. However, the prosecution not yet completed the investigation.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

Recording the same, the petition for relaxation is allowed and further the petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required for an interrogation.

¶17

-sd/-

¶18

25/03/2022

¶19

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶20

TRUE COPY

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶22

¶23

1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, POCHAMPALLI, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT.

¶24

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KRISHNAGIRI(FOR INFORMATION)

¶25

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NAGARASAMPATTY POLICE STATION, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT.

¶26

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶27

5 THE DHANABAKKIAMMAL SOCIAL WELFARE TRUST, D-3,1/338, VASANTHAM APARTMENT,SABARI SALAI, MADIPAKKAM, CHENNAI-91.

¶28

C.C. to M/S. D.ARUN Advocate on payment of necessary charges Sr.4538

¶29

Order in CRL MP.3899/2022 in CRL OP.22679/2021

¶30

Date :25/03/2022

¶31

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶32

RVR 29/03/2022

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Kanniyappan v. the State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanniyappan v. the State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Palanisamy Vs State Rep by

G.Kandasamy Vs Inspector of Police

N.Bharathidasan Vs State Rep by

R.Dinesh Vs the Inspector of Police

Karthick Vs State Rep by

Hemanth Kumar Vs State Rep by