Allowed

K.Malarvizhi v. the State Rep by Its

Madras HC18 Feb 2022CRL MP/1991/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal miscellaneous petition, the petitioner sought further extension of time to execute sureties beyond the limit set in a previous order, citing illness. The High Court granted a final extension of one month from the order's receipt date.

What did the court decide?

Time for executing sureties is extended finally by one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

K.Malarvizhi Vs the State Rep by Its — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Eighteenth day of February Two Thousand Twenty Two

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice R. PONGIAPPAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.1991 of 2022

¶7

IN CRL.OP.NO.5552 of 2020

¶8

1.K.MALARVIZHI [ PETITIONERS ]

¶9

2 K.R.KUMAR

¶10

¶11

THE STATE REP BY ITS, [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

¶12

DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT, THIRUVALLUR. (CR.NO.4 OF 2020)

¶13

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to further extend the time limit granted in order dated 04.01.2022 in Crl.MP.No.14493 of 2021 in Crl.OP.No.5552 of 2020 passed by this Hon'ble court and thus render justice.

¶14

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.M.GNANASEKAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶15

This petition has been filed to extend the time granted by this Court in Crl.MP.No.14493 of 2021 in Crl.O.P.No.5552 of 2020 dated 04.01.2022 for executing the sureties.

¶16

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that due to illness, the petitioners could not able to furnish the sureties within the stipulated time. Hence, he prays to extend the time.

¶17

Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that since the petitioners could not able to furnish the sureties within the stipulated time, this petition is ordered and the time for executing the sureties is extended finally by one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶20

-sd/-

¶21

18/02/2022

¶22

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶23

TRUE COPY

¶24

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶25

¶26

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, PONNERI.

¶27

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVALLUR [FOR INFORMATION]

¶28

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, THIRUVALLUR,THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT.

¶29

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶30

+1C.C. to M/S.M.GNANASEKAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.2603

Order

CRL MP.1991/2022 in

CRL.OP.5552/2020

Date :18/02/2022

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶37

CSK 23/02/2022

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Malarvizhi v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Malarvizhi v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Paranjothi @ Balan Vs State of Tamilnadu

Paranjothi @ Balan Vs State of Tamilnadu

M.Manikandan Vs State Rep by

Alex Vs the State Rep by

B.Rajesh Vs State Rep by Its

Sarathkumar Vs the State Rep.by