Subramaniyan v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
in Crl.A.No.SR50911 of 2022 P.N.PRAKASH, J.…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.No.16271 of 2022 in Crl.A.No.SR50911 of 2022
P.N.PRAKASH, J. AND
G.CHANDRASEKHARAN, J.
(Order of the Court was made by P.N.PRAKASH,J. )
Notice has been served on all the respondents/accused.
- Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 126 days in filing the above appeal is condoned.
The Registry shall number the appeal, if the same is otherwise in order. At the time of admission, post the matter along with Crl.A.No.294 of 2022 and print the names of the Advocates, who had appeared for the respondents/accused in Crl.M.P.No.16271 of 2022.
nsd
Coram
P.N.PRAKASH
G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court