S.Suresh v. Priyanka
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition filed to condone delay in filing a criminal revision petition. The petition was rejected because the petitioner failed to comply with a prior order to deposit a security amount.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed for non-compliance; underlying criminal revision petition rejected.
What the court decided
Crl.M.P.No.14169 of 2022 in Crl.RC.SR.No.43426 of 2022
Crl.M.P.No.14169 of 2022 in Crl.RC.SR.No.43426 of 2022
P.VELMURUGAN,J.
The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 100 days in filing the above Criminal Revision Petition against Crl.M.P.No.784 of 2021 in Crl.M.P.No.168 of 2021 in DVC.No.1 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate cum Additional Mahila Court, Nagapattinam.
- When the matter was taken up for hearing on 01.11.2022, this Court had directed the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- to the credit of Crl.M.P.No.14169 of 2022 in Crl.RC.SR.No.43426 of 2022 before the Registry of this Court on or before 16.11.2022, failing which, the petition will be dismissed.
- Today (18.11.2022), when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the order of this Court has not been complied with.
1
Crl.M.P.No.14169 of 2022 in Crl.RC.SR.No.43426 of 2022
P.VELMURUGAN,J.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal miscellaneous petition seeking condonation of delay should be allowed due to non-compliance with the deposit order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
Coram
VELMURUGAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court