Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Court closed petition noting no direction passed against railways. Permitted petitioners to file review of earlier order within four weeks notwithstanding limitation.
Contempt petition closed; petitioners permitted to file review of earlier order within four weeks without limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont. P(MD)No.836 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 12.10.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
Cont. P(MD)No.836 of 2022 in W.P.(MD)No.21952 of 2018
1.P.P.V.Annamalai
2.P.P.V.Panchacharam
3.P.P.V.Subaiah
4.P.P.V.Velayutham ... Petitioners
Vs.
3.Venkatraman Executive Engineer, Gauge Conversion/I, Tiruchirappalli.
... Respondents
1/3
Cont. P(MD)No.836 of 2022
Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents herein for having committed an offence of contempt of court by violating the order of this Court in W.P.No.21952 of 2018, dated 14.11.2018.
For Petitioners :Mr.S.Ramesh
For Respondents :Mrs.L.Victoria Gowri Assistant Solicitor General
O R D E R
Since no direction has been passed against the railways, the question of entertaining this contempt petition will not arise. It stands closed. However, the petitioners are permitted to file a petition for reviewing the order dated 14.11.2018 in W.P.(MD)No.21952 of 2018. If
any such review petition is filed within four weeks, the same shall be entertained without reference to limitation.
12.10.2022
Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No rmi
2/3
Cont. P(MD)No.836 of 2022
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
rmi
ORDER MADE IN
Cont. P(MD)No.836 of 2022 in W.P.(MD)No.21952 of 2018
12.10.2022
3/3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be entertained given no direction was passed against the railways.
Whether the petitioners can file a review petition of the order dated 14.11.2018 within four weeks without limitation bar.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.P.V.Annamalai
P.P.V.Panchacharam
P.P.V.Subaiah
P.P.V.Velayutham
Padmanabhan
Paneerselvam Anand
G.R.Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
