Balamurali v. Latha
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition was filed regarding the non-compliance of an order staying an impugned revenue order. The court was informed that there was no live matter requiring adjudication, and the petition was closed.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed with no further orders.
What the court decided
1 CONT.P.(MD)No.622 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.06.2022
CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN CONT.P.(MD)No.622 of 2022 IN W.P.(MD)No.8362 of 2021
Balamurali ... Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
- Latha, District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District.
- Murugesan,
Revenue Divisional Offier,
Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.
- Muthuraman, Tahsildar, Kodaikonal Taluk, Dindigul District. ... Contemnors/Respondents
Prayer: Contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.M.P.(MD)No.6330 of 2021 in W.P.(MD)No.8362 of 2021 dated 23.04.2021.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition, filed for willful disobedience of an order staying the impugned land revenue order, requires adjudication or disposal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Balamurali
- respondent
Latha, District Revenue Officer
- respondent
Murugesan, Revenue Divisional Officer
- respondent
Muthuraman, Tahsildar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court